In a one interview of National Conservative Examiner
(Examiner.com), straightly says Pacquiao rejects Obama’s new twist on the
Scripture. But Manny Pacquio, the legendary boxing champ,denies the statement
that he didn’t say anything about Leviticus 20:13. Leviticus 20:13 states “If a
man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is
detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.”
Here’s the statement of Pacquiao on his phone interview on
Bandila:
Pacman: “Di ko sinabi yan. In fact, hindi ko alam yung verse
dyan sa Leviticus. Hindi pa ako nabasa ng Leviticus. (I didn’t say
that, in fact I didn’t know that verse in Leviticus. I haven’t read Leviticus)
Dyan Castillejo : Linawin ko lang, hindi ka nagquote ng
verse na Leviticus 20:13 sa interview mo? (I just want to make it clear; you
haven’t quoted a verse in Leviticus 20:13 in your interview in Examiner.com?)
Pacman: Hindi ako nagsabi. Kasinungalingan yan. (It’s a
lie!)
Examiner.com Grandville Ampong admitted that he is the one
who wrote that. He affirms that the statement came from him not on Pacquiao’s
side. On the side of Ampong, he stated that “Nowhere in my supposition and integration
of my interview with Pacquiao did I mention that Pacquiao recited this
Leviticus 20:13… I have simply reminded in my column how God made it clear in
the Old Testament time that such practice of same-s3x marriage is detestable
and strictly forbidden.”
Still Pacman stands that he is against same s3x marriage
because he believes that it is against God’s law. He mentioned that he is not
actually against gays because he had a gay cousin. What he didn’t want is same
s3x marriage! He also confirmed that he has an interview with Mario Lopez in
Hollywood Entertainment show, “Extra”, today.
This comment of Pacquiao becomes trending in Twitter and even
in social networking sites.
Result of his statement against same s3x marriage includes
banned from Grove Shopping Mall and a report on petition to drop Nike brand as
endorser.
For you what is your standing on this issue?
0 comments:
Post a Comment